Wednesday, July 8, 2015

Tuesday, July 7, 2015

Hillary Clinton may not get Elected Because of the Constitution

Article 2 of the Constitution is very gender biased. It does not refer to the President, it refers to He. That is very specific. It is throughout Article 2.

Saturday, July 4, 2015

Women are the Last Group to Have Equal Rights

We yammer on about how women are treated around the world. Yet here in the USA we lack equal rights for women. The ERA amendment never passed.

Because of that if Hillary R. Clinton wins the popular vote, she may lose on standing .

Women need to solve this now.

Wednesday, July 1, 2015

Representation in the House.

Well we are worse off. We need to reexamine how representation works to the Constitution. I really did try to argue this before the court. They told me I did not have the heritage to talk about this. Well here I am. They won't shut me up now.


This blog shows my attempt to bring proper representation to the House of Representatives.  Read it from the bottom to the top.
Thanks

Sunday, October 16, 2011

Standing and Ripeness are no match for people.

So it moves forth. The people are demanding what was promised to them.

The only way to demand representation is to return to the 1 to 30000 for adult citizens. The only way to do that in this current chaos, is through Ammendment of the Constitution, through a Constitutional Convention.

Companies like... can build user interfaces for each rep(free market). Military grade security.

Wednesday, January 19, 2011

Reasons why I cannot bring this before the Federal Courts

I want to thank those who held my head up during this time.
This letter came to me from a friend.
-------------
I know, I know. They tried all this stuff back in the thirties. It didn't go over because everyone still knew how the Constitution operated on the government. Today people assume that the constitution operates on the people. It operates on the people in government first. 

You lose several ways. Yes, they purview your rights through the "14th amendment."  But the initial hurdle is YOUR standing before the "Court." You have to characterize yourself as an heir to the founders of the Constitution. Since the Federal Constitution was "written" by the "representatives" of the "states," your standing has to be as an heir to the people of one of the states. A challenge such as this is called a challenge to the jurisdiction of the court. It amounts to recusal of the judge. They won't like you. 

 Everything is very convoluted. If they challenge your claim that you have standing "that you are one of the people of one of the states," then you challenge their claim that they can hold office, since they haven't proven that they have standing to hold the office! (They are just as much a 14th amendment "person" as anyone else.) 

(Person) is defined in the 14th amendment. The original Constitution assumed the "people" to be constituted of Men, as in "mankind," which would include man and woman. The new definition includes a new being that is possibly, a former slave, a current slave, or a corporation. All corporations are fictions of the "government:" that is, "given permission to exist" by the government. Therefore, they are "dead" to their rights. They have none. The government treats you as a corporation. They address you in all caps, "JOE BLOW," whereas your proper noun name is "Joe Blow."


---------
So I lose and become moot. Sad

Tuesday, January 18, 2011

Standing

As a Citizen of the United States of America, I cannot bring a Constitutionality argument before the court. I lack the standing. The Court dismissed the case without reading the argument.

From this point, I am going to study what can do to rectify this disaster. We have the tools and talent to create what was originally written but never utilized.

This is not a difficult problem. The benefits will all stem from the fact we would have more people in the House. By nature those people will be trained in all the topics necessary to run our country. They will have gone to school to be ... Each of those skills will be of benefit to every citizen.

And I lack the standing.

And this topic is ripe for discussion.

Apportionment

The 14th Amendment to the Constitution
Section 2
"Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed. "

That word has doomed us to an aristocratic society. After this statement in the 14th amendment, our government's power stems from the number of rooms in the Capital Building. We have 435 room, and that is all the representatives we are going to get. Divide them amongst the states based on the number of persons.

I understand why this was done. It was done to reduce administrative costs. But, we have no need for those antiquated paper systems.

As our population increases and transparency forces its way into our society, this will be our downfall. Too much power in too few hands. And this will happen fast.

I love this country. I have taken oaths to protect and defend our Constitution. And Apportionment is the biggest threat to our nation. That word changed us from a democratic-republic to an aristocratic-republic.

Aaron Guerami

Monday, January 10, 2011

Order Dismissing Case - Yet, still I will continue

This order of dismissal was issued on 01/05/11, the same day I presented the case to the court in West Palm Beach.

------------------------

ORDER DISMISSING CASE

THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon filing the Complaint. The instant Complaint was filed herein January 5, 2011 [DE 1].1 Plaintiff Guerami, proceeding pro se, brings an action seeking the Court to declare 2 U.S.C. 2a, 2b, and 2c as unconstitutional. See [DE 1].1 Plaintiff's Complaint, in its entirety, states as follows:


  • I, Aaron Guerami, plaintiff, in the above styled cause, sues defendant(s) John Boenher
  • This action is filed Article 1 Section 2 Clause 3 of the U.S. Constitution.
  • 2 U.S.C 2a, 2b, 2c change the process of representation under Article 1 Section 2 Clause 3 without an Article V amendment. 
  • Article 1 Section 2 Clause 3: The number of Representatives shall not exceed one for every 30000, but each State shall have at least one Representative. 
  • 2 U.S.C. 2a (a) ... and the number of Representatives to which each State would be entitled under apportionment of then existing number of Representatives by the method known as equal proportions, no State to receive less than one member.
  • Wherefore, I demand the Courts to declare 2 U.S.C.2a, 2b,2c as unconstitutional.
[DE 1]
--------------
1 Plaintiff sees leave to proceed in forma pauperis. [DE-2]

After careful review, the Court concludes that the Plaintiff fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted. The more serious defects, however, are standing and ripeness.Because standing is jurisdictional, it must be considered by the Court sua sponte. AT&T Mobility,LLC v. National Ass'n for Stock Car Auto Racing, Inc., 494F.3d 1356,1360 (11th Cir. 2007). "Standing and ripeness present the threshold jurisdictional question of whether a court may consider the merits of a dispute." Elend v. Basham, 471 F.3d1199,1024 (11th Cir. 2006) (citation omitted). "Both standing and ripeness originate from the Constitution's Article III requirement that the jurisdiction of federal courts be limited to actual cases and controversies." Id. at 1204-1205 (citation omitted)."It is now axiomatic that standing requires the plaintiff to demonstrate injury in fact, causation, and redressability." Id., at 1205 (citation omitted). Here, where Plaintiff's Complaint fails to allege any facts which establish an actual case and controversy, the Court is not permitted to opine on the constitutionality of the section of the United States Constitution about which the Plaintiff complains.

     Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:
    

  1.   Plaintiff's Complain [DE 1] is hereby DISMISSED, without prejudice to file an amended complaint on or before January 20, 2011. The Clerk shall CLOSE this case and DENY any pending motions as moot.
DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Fort Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida this 5th day of January, 2011.
---------------
---------------
From what I understand of this dismissal is, I have not described the standing of the complaint.

Standing requirements

There are three standing requirements:
  1. Injury: The plaintiff must have suffered or imminently will suffer injury—an invasion of a legally protected interest that is concrete and particularized. The injury must be actual or imminent, distinct and palpable, not abstract. This injury could be economic as well as non-economic.
  2. Causation: There must be a causal connection between the injury and the conduct complained of, so that the injury is fairly traceable to the challenged action of the defendant and not the result of the independent action of some third party who is not before the court.[14]
  3. Redressability: It must be likely, as opposed to merely speculative, that a favorable court decision will redress the injury
Injury: I do not have representation under Article 1 Section 2 Clause 3 as compared to populations created by in other districts through out the districts in the United States of America. By using 2U.S.C. 2a, 2b, 2c, the defendant has shown gross negligence, willful misconduct and other claims in the method of equal appropriation, construction and operation of misrepresentation as dictated by Article 1 Section 2 Clause 3


Ripeness: Ripeness represents the other side of the coin of standing, and deals with whether the defendant in a case has gone so far in his/her abusive behavior that the court has a right to hear the case.

In this case The argument is ripe for action

Saturday, January 8, 2011

Filing

I filed case : 9:11-cv-80012-wpd #4
5 pages
Thu Jan 6 0:14:09 2011

Allegation of jurisdiction:
This actions is filed under: Article 1 Section 2 Clause 3 of the U.S. Constitution.

Statement of Facts:
1) 2 U.S.C. 2a, 2b,2c change the process of representation under Article 1 Section 2 Clause 3 without an Article V amendment.
2) Article 1 Section 2 Clause 3: ... The number of Representatives shall not exceed one for every thirty thousand, but each State shall have at least one Representative.
3) 2 U.S.C. 2a (a) ... and the number of Representatives to which each state would be entitled under an apportionment of the then existing number of Representatives by the method known as equal proportions, no State to receive less than one member.

Relief Request:
I demand the Courts to declare 2 U.S.C. 2a, 2b, 2c as unconstitutional.

Sunday, January 2, 2011

Thursday, December 30, 2010

The Great Government Jobs Shuffle

I know there is a great fear that we will lose jobs to change. This is not the case.

Article 1 Section 2 Clause 3 will generate the offset. Meaning, those who worked under the Executive Branch will now have Legislative positions. They will have more powerful positions. They will be compensated less for that increase in power.

This will cause stability in decision making.

Wednesday, December 8, 2010

Census data to this model

312700000/30000=10423.33333

That is a huge neural network that will reduce error or increase efficiency quickly. This house would work well.

Logistically this is already being done. Add mobile UIs/web for the user...
at this point it is who want to build(get paid for) the UI.

Security can be handled by the NSA.

This is just the Citizen/Representative interface system.

The house builds/contracts out their program to manage their rules. Like the severity of a Censor. You, rep. Rangel. you have been censored! Ha Ha.

Really, our tech industry could build this for us in 1 year. It can be distributed over many companies.

Saturday, February 6, 2010

Real Corporate Congressperson?

This comes from The Atlantic by Chris Good

Via Miller-McCune's Emily Badger: in an test of the Supreme Court's recent campaign finance decision--and its logic that corporations should be treated as people, when it comes to political money--a Maryland-based progressive PR firm is planning to run for Congress.

That is abhorrent! It is disgusting. Now more than ever the citizens of this great country needs to demand the congress follow the rules to the letter of the Constitution.

There is too much power in each seat of the house. This current non-constitutional system will produce feudalism.

Tuesday, January 12, 2010

The structure of a republic

By doing this, The Republic gets stronger because that is what you get. You get representation.

You get an input/output system that is capable of reducing error. It is kind of like a forum. An idea is presented to a small group. That group formulates ideas around the original idea. The idea gets more successful by convincing other groups through logical argument and evidence.

Benefits:
1) A benefit to this is that more ideas will be discarded then will be adopted.
2) Standardization is built in to the process.
3) It is difficult to lie to a true republic.

This is a republic.

Monday, January 11, 2010

Larger Government reduces error

It becomes more obvious every day. Today it is wall street.

We must enforce Art 1 Sec 2 Cl 3. The more people we have in a decision body, the smaller the error. More people would understand different topics and many people would create smarter policy. One to Thirty Thousand is about the right amount to create a representative government.

We need the house to become a virtual legislative body. Where Congress People live in the district and represent virtually their district. By living in the district, they will represent their district better. There will be fewer lobbyist bills brought before congress.

Bills will have more relevant conversation before being voted on. Bills can be edited while conversations occur.

From a computer science perspective, the representation ratio of 1 to 30000 is brilliant. It is a virtual neural network. A neural network reduces error.

It is a dishonor to all Americans and the Constitution by not building this social network. We can build this. We should have a conversation about this. This kind of change needs to be thought out so nobody gets upset.

Aaron

Thursday, December 24, 2009

Using Social Networking Tools as the House of Representatives.

The House of Representatives is a social network. It is suppose to represent the people to the government at a rate of 1 to 30000. That is ~11000 members. We can easily do this with the current social networking tool sets we have built.

This will produce a natural and immediate need for jobs. Each member would have 2 offices. A powerful green SD RAID cluster is placed in every representative's district office will require 10 people to operate. A second larger cluster in the office in Washington D.C. will require many people to run, maintain content, update and secure the system.

This will require many programmers, engineers, and developers to deploy. It will require a minimum of 40 processors per office. Citizens would have access to their Representative through their mobile devices or computers.

The representatives would have a second social networking system that is for the legislative process.

Replacement of the system would be on a 3-5 year basis. This would keep the factories operating and constantly incorporate new technologies. All the systems must be built in the United States. This will provide many more high tech jobs.

This system would allow a better distribution of power and through representation a correct solution to the requirements of the Constitution.

Wednesday, December 2, 2009

Incorrect representation of American Citizens in the House of Representatives

This is my biggest argument about our government. We are not represented correctly according to the Constitution.

http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/constitution.articlei.html


"The number of Representatives shall not exceed one for every thirty thousand, but each state shall have at least one Representative; "

Congress cannot change representation without an Article V amendment.

We should have ~11000 members in the house.

Our current government is defined by 2U.S.C. 2a, 2b, 2c, 2d. Not Article 1, Section 2, paragraph 3. 2U.S.C 2a,2b,2c,2d are unconstitutional since they change the rules of representation without an amendment. WHY??? Because of the size of the building. That is the only possible reason.

Here it comes, wait for it, 'Your nuts!'

We have the tools to do this. We have a beautiful internet. The System for the House of Representatives would require transparency, security, forums, prediction, evaluation and other computing systems. Each representative would require 2 offices. One in DC and one in the district. Many people would be required at each office.

This is how you create many high tech jobs. This correction would create about 1 million jobs to maintain the system. It will require several million support and development jobs. This would be enough to fix the economy. It would require 10s of millions new computers. This new network would be distributed across the country and should be built and protected by the NSA.

'Thirty' was the last word written in the Constitution by President Washington. We deserve the chance to solve this problem. We deserve a House that is citizen centric.
---------------
Other work I do:
Aaron's House System - A description of the purpose and requirements of the House of Representatives

Aaron's Reality - The Standard Vibration Model of physics